Ideas
Frameworks on AI governance, institutional design, and democratic authority — the ideas that run through the writing, talks, and work.
My work on AI is ultimately about power: who exercises it, what legitimizes it, and whether public institutions can still shape the systems that increasingly shape us.
This page brings together the frameworks that run through my work, from civic infrastructure and institutional design to board judgment, organizational change, and the future of human capability. Some operate at the level of political theory. Others surface in the boardroom, the ministry, the hospital, or the procurement process. Together they form the architecture behind the writing, the talks, and the work.
When AI begins to shape how people find work, receive care, learn, move through public systems, or participate in civic life, it ceases to be just software. It becomes infrastructure. Infrastructure sets the terms of dependence. It establishes defaults, gatekeepers, and asymmetries that are hard to unwind once they settle. The governing question is not simply whether AI is useful, but who defines the terms under which foundational systems are built, maintained, and contested. Markets have a role. They cannot be the sole authors of public life.
Best for: policymakers, city leaders, civic technologists, philanthropic leaders
Related reading
We build technologies faster than we build the institutions to govern them. The gap is not primarily technical. It is a failure of institutional imagination: the willingness to design governance structures that do not yet exist and to take that work as seriously as we take building models. Democratic authority over AI is not a constraint on innovation. It is the condition for innovation that lasts.
Best for: government leaders, foundation boards, international policy forums
Related reading